Serious Bleeding in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation Using Diltiazem With Apixaban or Rivaroxaban.

Importance: Diltiazem, a commonly prescribed ventricular rate-control medication for patients with atrial fibrillation, inhibits apixaban and rivaroxaban elimination, possibly causing overanticoagulation. Objective: To compare serious bleeding risk for new users of apixaban or rivaroxaban with atrial fibrillation treated with diltiazem or metoprolol. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cohort study included Medicare beneficiaries aged 65 years or older with atrial fibrillation who initiated apixaban or rivaroxaban use and also began treatment with diltiazem or metoprolol between January 1, 2012, and November 29, 2020. Patients were followed up to 365 days through November 30, 2020. Data were analyzed from August 2023 to February 2024. Exposures: Diltiazem and metoprolol. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was a composite of bleeding-related hospitalization and death with recent evidence of bleeding. Secondary outcomes were ischemic stroke or systemic embolism, major ischemic or hemorrhagic events (ischemic stroke, systemic embolism, intracranial or fatal extracranial bleeding, or death with recent evidence of bleeding), and death without recent evidence of bleeding. Hazard ratios (HRs) and rate differences (RDs) were adjusted for covariate differences with overlap weighting. Results: The study included 204 155 US Medicare beneficiaries, of whom 53 275 received diltiazem and 150 880 received metoprolol. Study patients (mean [SD] age, 76.9 [7.0] years; 52.7% female) had 90 927 person-years (PY) of follow-up (median, 120 [IQR, 59-281] days). Patients receiving diltiazem treatment had increased risk for the primary outcome (RD, 10.6 [95% CI, 7.0-14.2] per 1000 PY; HR, 1.21 [95% CI, 1.13-1.29]) and its components of bleeding-related hospitalization (RD, 8.2 [95% CI, 5.1-11.4] per 1000 PY; HR, 1.22 [95% CI, 1.13-1.31]) and death with recent evidence of bleeding (RD, 2.4 [95% CI, 0.6-4.2] per 1000 PY; HR, 1.19 [95% CI, 1.05-1.34]) compared with patients receiving metoprolol. Risk for the primary outcome with initial diltiazem doses exceeding 120 mg/d (RD, 15.1 [95% CI, 10.2-20.1] per 1000 PY; HR, 1.29 [95% CI, 1.19-1.39]) was greater than that for lower doses (RD, 6.7 [95% CI, 2.0-11.4] per 1000 PY; HR, 1.13 [95% CI, 1.04-1.24]). For doses exceeding 120 mg/d, the risk of major ischemic or hemorrhagic events was increased (HR, 1.14 [95% CI, 1.02-1.27]). Neither dose group had significant changes in the risk for ischemic stroke or systemic embolism or death without recent evidence of bleeding. When patients receiving high- and low-dose diltiazem treatment were directly compared, the HR for the primary outcome was 1.14 (95% CI, 1.02-1.26). Conclusions and Relevance: In Medicare patients with atrial fibrillation receiving apixaban or rivaroxaban, diltiazem was associated with greater risk of serious bleeding than metoprolol, particularly for diltiazem doses exceeding 120 mg/d.

Beta-Blockers after Myocardial Infarction and Preserved Ejection Fraction.

BACKGROUND: Most trials that have shown a benefit of beta-blocker treatment after myocardial infarction included patients with large myocardial infarctions and were conducted in an era before modern biomarker-based diagnosis of myocardial infarction and treatment with percutaneous coronary intervention, antithrombotic agents, high-intensity statins, and renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system antagonists. METHODS: In a parallel-group, open-label trial performed at 45 centers in Sweden, Estonia, and New Zealand, we randomly assigned patients with an acute myocardial infarction who had undergone coronary angiography and had a left ventricular ejection fraction of at least 50% to receive either long-term treatment with a beta-blocker (metoprolol or bisoprolol) or no beta-blocker treatment. The primary end point was a composite of death from any cause or new myocardial infarction. RESULTS: From September 2017 through May 2023, a total of 5020 patients were enrolled (95.4% of whom were from Sweden). The median follow-up was 3.5 years (interquartile range, 2.2 to 4.7). A primary end-point event occurred in 199 of 2508 patients (7.9%) in the beta-blocker group and in 208 of 2512 patients (8.3%) in the no-beta-blocker group (hazard ratio, 0.96; 95% confidence interval, 0.79 to 1.16; P = 0.64). Beta-blocker treatment did not appear to lead to a lower cumulative incidence of the secondary end points (death from any cause, 3.9% in the beta-blocker group and 4.1% in the no-beta-blocker group; death from cardiovascular causes, 1.5% and 1.3%, respectively; myocardial infarction, 4.5% and 4.7%; hospitalization for atrial fibrillation, 1.1% and 1.4%; and hospitalization for heart failure, 0.8% and 0.9%). With regard to safety end points, hospitalization for bradycardia, second- or third-degree atrioventricular block, hypotension, syncope, or implantation of a pacemaker occurred in 3.4% of the patients in the beta-blocker group and in 3.2% of those in the no-beta-blocker group; hospitalization for asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in 0.6% and 0.6%, respectively; and hospitalization for stroke in 1.4% and 1.8%. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with acute myocardial infarction who underwent early coronary angiography and had a preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (≥50%), long-term beta-blocker treatment did not lead to a lower risk of the composite primary end point of death from any cause or new myocardial infarction than no beta-blocker use. (Funded by the Swedish Research Council and others; REDUCE-AMI ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03278509.).

Pharmacokinetics and bioequivalence of two metoprolol succinate extended release tablets in healthy Chinese subjects under fasting and fed conditions.

AIMS: The aims of this study were to evaluate and compare the pharmacokinetic profiles and establish bioequivalence of test and reference metoprolol succinate extended-release (ER) tablets in healthy Chinese subjects under fasting and fed conditions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Subjects were randomly assigned to either the fasting or the fed group and also to one of the two treatment sequences (test-reference or reference-test), according to which they received a single 47.5-mg dose of the test or reference metoprolol ER tablet in the study periods. During each period, blood samples were collected at pre-dose and at intervals up to 48 hours after dosing. Plasma concentrations of metoprolol were determined by liquid chromatography. The safety of both ER tablets was monitored throughout the study. RESULTS: 60 subjects were enrolled and all completed the study, with 30 participants each in the fasting and fed groups. In both groups, the 90% confidence intervals for AUC0-48h, AUC0-inf, and Cmax were within the acceptable bioequivalence range (80 - 125%). There were no significant differences in adverse event (AE) reporting between the subjects receiving test or reference ER tablet. No serious AEs occurred during the study period. CONCLUSION: The test metoprolol ER tablet was bioequivalent to the reference metoprolol ER tablet (Betaloc ZOK) in healthy Chinese subjects measured under both fasting and fed conditions. Both formulations were well tolerated by all study participants.

Association between P-pulmonale and respiratory morbidity in COPD: a secondary analysis of the BLOCK-COPD trial.

RATIONALE: Pulmonary hypertension (PH) in COPD confers increased risk of exacerbations (ECOPD). Electrocardiogram (ECG) indicators of PH are prognostic both in PH and COPD. In the Beta-Blockers for the Prevention of Acute Exacerbations of COPD (BLOCK-COPD) trial, metoprolol increased risk of severe ECOPD through unclear mechanisms. OBJECTIVE: We evaluated whether an ECG indicator of PH, P-pulmonale, would be associated with ECOPD and whether participants with P-pulmonale randomized to metoprolol were at higher risk of ECOPD and worsened respiratory symptoms given the potential detrimental effects of beta-blockers in PH. METHODS: ECGs of 501 participants were analyzed for P-pulmonale (P wave enlargement in lead II). Cox proportional hazards models evaluated for associations between P-pulmonale and time to ECOPD (all and severe) for all participants and by treatment assignment (metoprolol vs. placebo). Linear mixed-effects models evaluated the association between treatment assignment and P-pulmonale on change in symptom scores (measured by CAT and SOBQ). RESULTS: We identified no association between P-pulmonale and risk of any ECOPD or severe ECOPD. However, in individuals with P-pulmonale, metoprolol was associated with increased risk for ECOPD (aHR 2.92, 95% CI: 1.45-5.85). There was no association between metoprolol and ECOPD in individuals without P-pulmonale (aHR 1.01, 95% CI: 0.77-1.31). Individuals with P-pulmonale assigned to metoprolol experienced worsening symptoms (mean increase of 3.95, 95% CI: 1.32-6.58) whereas those assigned to placebo experienced a mean improvement in CAT score of -2.45 (95% CI: -0.30- -4.61). CONCLUSIONS: In individuals with P-pulmonale, metoprolol was associated with increased exacerbation risk and worsened symptoms. These findings may explain the findings observed in BLOCK-COPD.

The role of plasma concentrations and drug characteristics of beta-blockers in fall risk of older persons.

Beta-blocker usage is inconsistently associated with increased fall risk in the literature. However, due to age-related changes and interindividual heterogeneity in pharmacokinetics and dynamics, it is difficult to predict which older adults are more at risk for falls. Therefore, we wanted to explore whether elevated plasma concentrations of selective and nonselective beta-blockers are associated with an increased risk of falls in older beta-blocker users. To answer our research question, we analyzed samples of selective (metoprolol, n = 316) and nonselective beta-blockers (sotalol, timolol, propranolol, and carvedilol, n = 179) users from the B-PROOF cohort. The associations between the beta-blocker concentration and time to first fall were assessed using Cox proportional hazard models. Change of concentration over time in relation to fall risk was assessed with logistic regression models. Models were adjusted for potential confounders. Our results showed that above the median concentration of metoprolol was associated with an increased fall risk (HR 1.55 [1.11-2.16], p = .01). No association was found for nonselective beta-blocker concentrations. Also, changes in concentration over time were not associated with increased fall risk. To conclude, metoprolol plasma concentrations were associated with an increased risk of falls in metoprolol users while no associations were found for nonselective beta-blockers users. This might be caused by a decreased ß1-selectivity in high plasma concentrations. In the future, beta-blocker concentrations could potentially help clinicians estimate fall risk in older beta-blockers users and personalize treatment.

Improvement in hemodynamics of amlodipine besylate combined with metoprolol in patients with hypertension complicated by heart failure.

To observe the effect of amlodipine besylate combined with metoprolol in treating hypertension and heart failure. Total number of patients with hypertension combined with HF admitted to our hospital was One hundred and fifty from May 2017 to May 2022 selected for the study and they were distributed into single drug group and combination group by the method of random number table, with the total number of 75 cases in every group. Metoprolol treatment was given to the single drug group and metoprolol combined with amlodipine besylate treatment was given to the combination group. Both groups' scientific outcomes were compared, including their ventricular function, inflammatory factors, hemodynamics and liver and kidney function. Adverse treatment-related side events for patients were also tallied. Compared to the single drug group, the combination group's overall treatment effectiveness was higher (P<0.05). The combined group had better ventricular function, improved hemodynamics and lower levels of inflammatory factors (P<0.05). The liver, kidney function and adverse effects outcomes were the same in both groups (P>0.05). Amlodipine besylate combined with metoprolol has a better clinical effect in treating hypertension combined with heart failure, which can more effectively improve patients' cardiac function, inflammation and hemodynamics.

Acute liver injury induced by drug interaction between dacomitinib and metoprolol due to the inhibition of CYP2D6 by dacomitinib.

INTRODUCTION: In recent years, oral antineoplastic agents are commonly used in antitumor therapy. The interaction between drugs may affect the efficacy of drugs or lead to adverse reactions. We describe the case of a patient who presented acute liver injury, possibly induced by the concomitant use of metoprolol and dacomitinib. CASE REPORT: A 62-year-old male patient with non-small cell lung cancer was admitted for anti-cancer treatment. He regularly took metoprolol tartrate 12.5 mg, 2/day for hypertension. He was treated with dacomitinib according to EGFR Exon21 L858R positive. After 3 days of dacomitinib, the patient's alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and glutathione aminotransferase (AST) increased, and the heart rate and systolic blood pressure of the patient decreased significantly. The patient was diagnosed with acute liver injury. MANAGEMENT AND OUTCOMES: Dacomitinib was discontinued and glutathione, magnesium isoglycyrrhizinate were given to treat acute liver injury. Two days after discontinued dacomitinib, the patient's heart rate increased, but the ALT and AST of the patient elevated again. Metoprolol tartrate was subsequently discontinued and the ALT and AST gradually decreased and the patient discharged from the hospital eight days later with his liver function improved. DISCUSSION: To our knowledge, this is the first case in the literature of acute liver injury possibly induced by the interaction between metoprolol and dacomitinib. The interaction most likely arose because dacomitinib is a CYP2D6 strong inhibitor and could therefore impair the metabolism of metoprolol (a CYP2D6 substrate) and increase its serum concentration. Therefore, hepatic function should be carefully monitored in patients treated with dacomitinib and metoprolol and other inhibitors or inducers of CYP2D6.

Clinically Significant Bradycardia and Hypotension Following Consumption of Betel Leaf in a Patient Treated for Chronic Atrial Fibrillation.

Purpose: A case of new onset bradycardia and hypotension following betel leaf consumption in combination with verapamil and metoprolol in an atrial fibrillation (AF) patient. Summary: A 66-year-old Nigerian woman presented to the emergency department for evaluation of multiple near syncope episodes with underlying AF and slow ventricular response. After initial evaluation, the patient disclosed she had ingested several betel leaves that morning. She was admitted for observation of severe, progressive hypotension and symptomatic bradycardia. Her past medical history included AF, type 2 diabetes, asthma, obesity, hypertension and hypothyroidism. Her home medications consisted of spironolactone, metoprolol succinate, and verapamil ER. Upon admission, her home medications were held. She received IV fluids and atropine .4 mg IV as needed for symptomatic bradycardia. Approximately 18 h following admission, her vital signs stabilized and her labs returned to baseline. She remained stable and was discharged with a recommendation to continue her home medications at prescribed doses with reduced doses of verapamil and metoprolol and to follow-up with her primary care provider. Conclusion: A patient with a history of AF developed significant hypotension and symptomatic bradycardia after betel leaf consumption resulting in an overnight critical care unit admission. The use of betel leaf is not common in the United States; however, practitioners should be cognizant of the use of complementary and alternative medications like betel leaf and incorporate this knowledge in patient evaluation. Patients consuming betel leaf or betel nut should be evaluated for cardiovascular effects as well as laboratory evaluation for organ damage.

Comparison of new-onset post-operative atrial fibrillation between patients receiving carvedilol and metoprolol after off-pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery.

OBJECTIVE: Post-operative atrial fibrillation (POAF) is a common complication of coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery. Previous studies suggest carvedilol is more effective than metoprolol in preventing POAF in on-pump CABG. This study investigated if the same benefit would be seen in off-pump CABG. METHODS: This single-center, retrospective review compared rates of new-onset POAF between adult patients who received carvedilol and metoprolol after off-pump CABG surgery. Safety endpoints included hypotension, bradycardia, dyspnea, and the composite. Multivariate logistic regression was conducted to identify associations between demographics, potential confounders, and beta-blocker dose and POAF. Kaplan-Meier plots and Cox proportional-hazards models examined differences in time-to-event for POAF. RESULTS: 134 patients were included (34 carvedilol and 100 metoprolol). The mean age was 63 years, 70.9% were male, 85% had history of hypertension, 3.7% had history of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, and 38.8% were taking beta blockers prior to admission. POAF developed in 2 patients (5.8%) in the carvedilol group and 24 patients (24.0%) in the metoprolol group (odds ratio 0.17 [95% CI 0.03-0.83], p = 0.023). Safety endpoints occurred in 10 carvedilol (29.4%) and 44 metoprolol (44.0%) patients (p = 0.134). Hypotension and dyspnea rates were similar between groups; bradycardia occurred more commonly among metoprolol-treated patients (p = 0.040). Time-to-event analyses revealed a hazard ratio = 0.22 (95% CI 0.05-0.93, p = 0.040) for carvedilol use. CONCLUSIONS: In this single-center, retrospective study of off-pump CABG patients, carvedilol was associated with reduced POAF risk and enhanced safety compared to metoprolol.

Co-prescription of metoprolol and CYP2D6-inhibiting antidepressants before and after implementation of an optimized drug interaction database in Norway.

PURPOSE: To compare the co-prescription of metoprolol and potent CYP2D6-inhibiting antidepressants before and during a 10-year period after implementation of an optimized drug interaction database into clinical decision support systems in Norway. METHODS: The study was a retrospective, cross-sequential nationwide analysis of drug-dispensing data retrieved from the Norwegian Prescription Database over a 1-year period before (2007) and two 1-year periods after (2012 and 2017) implementation of a drug interaction database providing recommendations on non-interacting alternative medications. Primary outcome was changes in co-prescription rates of metoprolol and the potent CYP2D6-inhibiting antidepressants fluoxetine, paroxetine, or bupropion relative to alternative antidepressants with no or limited CYP2D6 inhibitory potential. To control for potential secular trend bias, a comparison group consisting of atenolol/bisoprolol users was included. RESULTS: The co-prescription rate of metoprolol with potent CYP2D6 inhibitors declined following implementation of the optimized database, by 21% (P < 0.001) after 5 years and by 40% (P < 0.001) after 10 years. Compared with atenolol/bisoprolol users, patients treated with metoprolol had significantly reduced likelihood of being prescribed a CYP2D6-inhibiting antidepressant in the two post-implementation periods (OR 0.61 (95% CI 0.54-0.69) and OR 0.45 (95% CI 0.40-0.51), respectively, versus OR 0.84 (95% CI 0.74-0.94) prior to implementation). Small and mostly insignificant differences in average daily metoprolol dosage were found between patients treated with the various antidepressants. CONCLUSION: The present study suggests that implementation of a drug interaction database providing recommendations on non-interacting drug alternatives contributes to reduced co-prescribing of drug combinations associated with potentially serious adverse effects.

Intravenous Metoprolol Versus Diltiazem for Rate Control in Atrial Fibrillation.

BACKGROUND: Currently, it remains unclear whether ß-blockers or nondihydropyridine calcium channel blockers are preferred for the acute management of atrial fibrillation (AF). OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of intravenous (IV) metoprolol and diltiazem for rate control. METHODS: This was a single-center, retrospective cohort study of patients who presented to the emergency department between 2015 and 2019 with AF with rapid ventricular rate (RVR) and received IV metoprolol or diltiazem. The primary outcome was the percentage of patients who achieved rate control (defined as heart rate < 100 beats per minute). Secondary outcomes included time to rate control, percentage of patients requiring additional agents for rate control, and incidence of cardioversion, bradycardia, and hypotension. RESULTS: A total of 200 patients were included in this study. Rate control was achieved in 35% and 41% of the metoprolol and diltiazem groups, respectively (P = 0.38). Mean time to rate control was not significantly different between the metoprolol and diltiazem groups (35 vs 21 minutes, P = 0.23). One patient developed hypotension, no patient developed bradycardia, and 4 patients required electric cardioversion. No adverse events were observed in patients with ejection fraction ≤40%. CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE: There was no difference in the achievement of rate control between IV metoprolol and diltiazem. This is the largest study to date comparing the two classes of agents for acute rate control in AF. No patient-specific factors were identified that would influence the preferential use of one medication over the other.

Comparative effectiveness of metoprolol, ivabradine, and its combination in the management of inappropriate sinus tachycardia in coronary artery bypass graft patients.

BACKGROUND: Inappropriate sinus tachycardia (IST) is an arrhythmic complication observed after coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery which left untreated, commonly increases chances of postoperative stroke. The primary study objective was comparing effectiveness of beta blocker-metoprolol; a specific If blocker-ivabradine and its combination in patients who develop IST as a complication following CABG. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An open-labeled, investigator initiated, clinical study was conducted on 150 patients who developed IST (heart rate [HR] >100 beats/min) following elective CABG surgery. The patients were randomized into three treatment groups. Group I - received ivabradine (5 mg), Group II - metoprolol (25 mg), and Group III - ivabradine (5 mg) and metoprolol (25 mg). Treatment was given orally, twice a day for 7 days in all the three groups postoperatively. Primary endpoints were comparative effectiveness in HR and blood pressure reduction following treatment. RESULTS: IST was diagnosed by an electrocardiogram (12-lead) considering morphological features of P-wave and with 32% increase from baseline HR in all the three groups. Compared to IST arrthymic rate, HR was reduced in all groups following respective treatment (P = 0.05). Reduction in HR was significant (P < 0.05) in combination group followed by ivabradine which was significantly greater than metoprolol treated group. None of the treatments clinically changed the systolic, diastolic and mean blood pressure till discharge. No surgery/treatment-related complications were observed in any groups. CONCLUSION: Ivabradine stands as a pharmacological option for controlling HR and rhythm without associated side effects in postoperative CABG patients with IST.

Risk of clinically relevant hyperglycemia with metoprolol compared to carvedilol in older adults with heart failure and diabetes.

BACKGROUND: Although prior literature suggests that metoprolol may worsen glucose control compared to carvedilol, whether this has clinical relevance among older adults with diabetes and heart failure (HF) remains an open question. METHODS: This was a US retrospective cohort study utilizing data sourced from a 50% national sample of Medicare fee-for-service claims of patients with part D prescription drug coverage (2007-2017). Among patients with diabetes and HF, we identified initiators of metoprolol or carvedilol, which were 1:1 propensity score matched on >90 variables. The primary outcome was initiation of a new oral or injectable antidiabetic medication (proxy for uncontrolled diabetes); secondary outcomes included initiation of insulin and severe hyperglycemic event (composite of emergency room visits or hospitalizations related to hyperglycemia). RESULTS: Among 24 239 propensity score-matched pairs (mean [SD] age 77.7 [8.0] years; male [39.1%]), there were 8150 (incidence rate per 100 person-years [IR] = 33.5) episodes of antidiabetic medication initiation among metoprolol users (exposure arm) compared to 8576 (IR = 33.4) among carvedilol users (comparator arm) compared to corresponding to an adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) of 0.97 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.94, 1.01). Similarly, metoprolol was not associated with a significant increase in the risk of secondary outcomes including insulin initiation: aHR of 0.98 (95% CI: 0.93, 1.04) and severe hyperglycemic events: aHR of 0.98 (95% CI: 0.93, 1.02). CONCLUSIONS: In this large study of older adults with HF and diabetes, initiation of metoprolol compared to carvedilol was not associated with an increase in the risk of clinically relevant hyperglycemia.

Therapeutic Inefficacy and Proarrhythmic Nature of Metoprolol Succinate and Carvedilol Therapy in Patients With Idiopathic, Frequent, Monomorphic Premature Ventricular Contractions.

BACKGROUND: Antiarrhythmic drugs remain the first-line therapy for treatment of idiopathic ventricular arrhythmias. STUDY QUESTION: The aim of this study was to assess the therapeutic efficacy of extended-release metoprolol succinate (MetS) and carvedilol for idiopathic, frequent, monomorphic premature ventricular contractions (PVCs). STUDY DESIGN: Study population consisted of 114 consecutive patients: 71 received MetS and 43 received carvedilol. MEASURES AND OUTCOMES: All patients underwent 24-hour Holter monitoring at baseline and during drug therapy. PVC-burden response to drug therapy was categorized as "good" (≥80% reduction), "poor" (either <80% reduction or ≤50% increase), and "proarrhythmic" responses (>50% increase) based on change in PVC burden compared with baseline. RESULTS: Most common presenting symptom was palpitations (65.8%), followed by coincidental discovery (29%). The mean MetS and carvedilol dosages were 65.57 ± 30.67 mg/d and 23.66 ± 4.26 mg/d, respectively. "Good," "poor," and "proarrhythmic" responses were observed in 11.3% and 16.3%, 63.4% and 67.4%, and 25.3% and 16.3% of patients treated with MetS and carvedilol, respectively. In patients with relatively high (≥16%) PVC burden, the sum of "poor"/"proarrhythmic" response was observed in 95.5% and 86.4% of patients treated with MetS and carvedilol, respectively. "Proarrhythmic" response was observed in 21.9% of the patients, particularly in the presence of relatively lower (≤10%) baseline PVC burden. Patients with "good" response during beta-blocker therapy had higher baseline daily average intrinsic total heart beats compared with patients with "poor"/"proarrhythmic" response combined (96,437 ± 26,488 vs. 86,635 ± 15,028, P = 0.047, respectively). Side effects and intolerance were observed in 5.6% and 18.6% of patients treated with MetS and carvedilol, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: MetS and carvedilol for idiopathic, frequent, monomorphic PVCs are frequently inefficient. Therapeutic efficacy decreases further in patients with relatively high (≥16%) PVC burden. Relatively higher baseline daily intrinsic total heart beats may be used to predict "good" response before beta-blocker therapy.

Safety, Efficacy, and Dose Protocol of Metoprolol for Heart Rate Reduction in Pediatric Outpatients Undergoing Cardiac CT Angiography. / Segurança, Eficácia e Protocolo de Dose de Metoprolol para Redução de Frequência Cardíaca em Pacientes Pediátricos Externos que Passaram por Angiografia Cardíaca por TC.

BACKGROUND: Image quality and radiation dose are optimized with a slow, steady heart rate (HR) when imaging the coronary arteries during cardiac computed tomography angiography (CCTA). The safety, efficacy, and protocol for HR reduction with beta blocker medication is not well described in a pediatric patient population. OBJECTIVE: Provide a safe and efficient metoprolol dose protocol to be used in pediatric outpatients undergoing CCTA. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of all pediatric outpatients who received metoprolol during CCTA. Demographic and clinical characteristics were summarized and the average reduction in HR was estimated using a multivariate linear regression model. Images were evaluated on a 1-4 scale (1= optimal). RESULTS: Seventy-eight pediatric outpatients underwent a CCTA scan with the use of metoprolol. The median age was 13 years, median weight of 46 kg, and 36 (46%) were male. The median doses of metoprolol were 1.5 (IQR 1.1, 1.8) mg/kg and 0.4 (IQR 0.2, 0.7) mg/kg for oral and intravenous administrations, respectively. Procedural dose-length product was 57 (IQR 30, 119) mGy*cm. The average reduction in HR was 19 (IQR 12, 26) beats per minute, or 23%. No complications or adverse events were reported. CONCLUSION: Use of metoprolol in a pediatric outpatient setting for HR reduction prior to CCTA is safe and effective. A metoprolol dose protocol can be reproduced when a slower HR is needed, ensuring faster acquisition times, clear images, and associated reduction in radiation exposure in this population. (Arq Bras Cardiol. 2021; 116(1):100-105).

FUNDAMENTO: Qualidade de imagem e dose de radiação são otimizadas com uma frequência cardíaca (FC) lenta e estável na realização de imagens de artérias coronárias durante a angiografia cardíaca por tomografia computadorizada (CCTA, do inglês cardiac computed tomography angiography) A segurança, a eficácia e o protocolo para a redução da FC com medicamento betabloqueador ainda não foi bem descrita em uma população de pacientes pediátricos. OBJETIVO: Oferecer um protocolo de dose de metoprolol eficiente a ser usado em pacientes pediátricos externos durante a CCTA. MÉTODOS: Realizamos uma revisão retrospectiva de todos os pacientes pediátricos externos que receberam o metoprolol durante a CCTA. As características demográficas e clínicas foram resumidas e a redução média em FC foi estimada utilizando-se um modelo de regressão linear multivariada. As imagens foram avaliadas em uma escala de 1 a 4 (1= ideal). RESULTADOS: Um total de 78 pacientes externos passaram a uma CCTA com o uso de metoprolol. A média de idade foi de 13 anos, a média de peso foi de 46 kg, e 36 pacientes (46%) eram do sexo masculino. As doses médias de metoprolol foram 1,5 (IQR 1,1; 1,8) mg/kg, e 0,4 (IQR 0,2; 0,7) mg/kg para administrações orais e intravenosas, respectivamente. O produto dose-comprimento por exame foi de 57 (IQR 30, 119) mGy*cm. A redução média da FC foi 19 (IQR 12, 26) batimentos por minuto, ou 23%. Não foram relatadas complicações ou eventos adversos. CONCLUSÃO: O uso de metoprolol num cenário de pacientes pediátricos externos para redução da FC antes de uma CCTA é seguro e eficiente. Pode-se reproduzir um protocolo de dose de metoprolol quando for necessário atingir uma FC mais lenta, garantindo tempos de aquisição mais rápidos, imagens mais claras e redução na exposição à radiação nessa população. (Arq Bras Cardiol. 2021; 116(1):100-105).

Segurança, Eficácia e Protocolo de Dose de Metoprolol para Redução de Frequência Cardíaca em Pacientes Pediátricos Externos que Passaram por Angiografia Cardíaca por TC / Safety, Efficacy, and Dose Protocol of Metoprolol for Heart Rate Reduction in Pediatric Outpatients Undergoing Cardiac CT Angiography

Resumo Fundamento Qualidade de imagem e dose de radiação são otimizadas com uma frequência cardíaca (FC) lenta e estável na realização de imagens de artérias coronárias durante a angiografia cardíaca por tomografia computadorizada (CCTA, do inglês cardiac computed tomography angiography) A segurança, a eficácia e o protocolo para a redução da FC com medicamento betabloqueador ainda não foi bem descrita em uma população de pacientes pediátricos. Objetivo Oferecer um protocolo de dose de metoprolol eficiente a ser usado em pacientes pediátricos externos durante a CCTA. Métodos Realizamos uma revisão retrospectiva de todos os pacientes pediátricos externos que receberam o metoprolol durante a CCTA. As características demográficas e clínicas foram resumidas e a redução média em FC foi estimada utilizando-se um modelo de regressão linear multivariada. As imagens foram avaliadas em uma escala de 1 a 4 (1= ideal). Resultados Um total de 78 pacientes externos passaram a uma CCTA com o uso de metoprolol. A média de idade foi de 13 anos, a média de peso foi de 46 kg, e 36 pacientes (46%) eram do sexo masculino. As doses médias de metoprolol foram 1,5 (IQR 1,1; 1,8) mg/kg, e 0,4 (IQR 0,2; 0,7) mg/kg para administrações orais e intravenosas, respectivamente. O produto dose-comprimento por exame foi de 57 (IQR 30, 119) mGy*cm. A redução média da FC foi 19 (IQR 12, 26) batimentos por minuto, ou 23%. Não foram relatadas complicações ou eventos adversos. Conclusão O uso de metoprolol num cenário de pacientes pediátricos externos para redução da FC antes de uma CCTA é seguro e eficiente. Pode-se reproduzir um protocolo de dose de metoprolol quando for necessário atingir uma FC mais lenta, garantindo tempos de aquisição mais rápidos, imagens mais claras e redução na exposição à radiação nessa população. (Arq Bras Cardiol. 2021; 116(1):100-105)

Abstract Background Image quality and radiation dose are optimized with a slow, steady heart rate (HR) when imaging the coronary arteries during cardiac computed tomography angiography (CCTA). The safety, efficacy, and protocol for HR reduction with beta blocker medication is not well described in a pediatric patient population. Objective Provide a safe and efficient metoprolol dose protocol to be used in pediatric outpatients undergoing CCTA. Methods We conducted a retrospective review of all pediatric outpatients who received metoprolol during CCTA. Demographic and clinical characteristics were summarized and the average reduction in HR was estimated using a multivariate linear regression model. Images were evaluated on a 1-4 scale (1= optimal). Results Seventy-eight pediatric outpatients underwent a CCTA scan with the use of metoprolol. The median age was 13 years, median weight of 46 kg, and 36 (46%) were male. The median doses of metoprolol were 1.5 (IQR 1.1, 1.8) mg/kg and 0.4 (IQR 0.2, 0.7) mg/kg for oral and intravenous administrations, respectively. Procedural dose-length product was 57 (IQR 30, 119) mGy*cm. The average reduction in HR was 19 (IQR 12, 26) beats per minute, or 23%. No complications or adverse events were reported. Conclusion Use of metoprolol in a pediatric outpatient setting for HR reduction prior to CCTA is safe and effective. A metoprolol dose protocol can be reproduced when a slower HR is needed, ensuring faster acquisition times, clear images, and associated reduction in radiation exposure in this population. (Arq Bras Cardiol. 2021; 116(1):100-105)

Effect of metoprolol tartrate tablets and recombinant human B-type natriuretic peptide on the sudden cardiac death and malignant arrhythmias in patients with acute myocardial infarction and heart failure.

To explore the effect of metoprolol tartrate tablets and recombinant human natriuretic peptide B (NPPB) on sudden cardiac death and malignant arrhythmias in patients with acute myocardial infarction and patients with heart failure (AMI-HF). A total of 105 AMI-HF patients treatedfrom January 2020 and June 2021 were enrolled and divided into Group I (n=53) and Group II (n=52). Both groups received conventional treatment, and Group II was additionally treated with metoprolol tartrate tablets and NPPB. The clinical observation indicators of the two groups of patients were compared. Group II had better left ventricular end diastolic diameter (LVEDd), left ventricular end systolic diameter (LVESD) and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) (p<0.05). The standard deviation of NN (R-R) interval (SDNN), mean NN (R-R), root mean square of continuous difference (RMSSD) and the percentage of difference between adjacent RR intervals >50ms (pNN50) increased after treatment, with more increase in the Group II (p<0.05). Group II obtained significantly lower levels of B type natriuretic peptide (BNP),N terminal pro B type natriuretic peptide (NT-ProBNP), interleukin (IL)-6 and hs-CRP in contrast to Group I (p<0.05). Markedly higher total response rates were observed in Group II (p<0.05). The combination of metoprolol tartrate tablets and NPPB is effective in treating AMI-HF.